'Review Time', the CTA video that analyzes some of the most controversial plays of the matchday in the First and Second Divisions, focused this week on Rayo Vallecano-Real Sociedad and Real Betis-Real Madrid, among other matches.
In the first of those, it sided with Rayo’s complaints about the penalty on Carlos Martín. They say Turrientes’ challenge was a "clear and persistent" hold, that the on-field referee’s decision was wrong, and that VAR "should have intervened because it was a clear, obvious and manifest error".
In the same match, Pulido Santana alerted Guzmán Mansilla from the VAR room, leading him to disallow Rayo’s goal after a five-minute review.
The CTA explains that "when the contact is the result of the natural planting of the foot after a previous action on the ball, the threshold for recklessness is left to the referee’s interpretation. For the CTA, since it was not a clear, obvious and manifest error, VAR should not have intervened and should have respected the on-field referee’s decision".
The CTA disagrees with Real Madrid
In the move that ended with Bellerín’s equalizer, Madrid wanted the goal ruled out for a prior foul by Antony on Mendy.
The video explains that for a holding offense to be punishable, "there must be a clear hold with a direct cause-and-effect relationship between the attacker’s action and its effect on the defender. Light contact falls within the referee’s interpretation.”
This article was translated into English by Artificial Intelligence. You can read the original version in 🇪🇸 here.
